浏览量:0
时间:2025-05-18
1、rhetorically翻译。rhetorically翻译介绍如下:修辞的;修辞学上;修辞学意义而言。双语例句 How does this introduction function rhetorically?这样的导言在修辞学上起什么作用?Rhetorically, his speech was excellent。从修辞学上来说,他的讲演很出色。‘Do you think I’m stupid?' she asked rhetorically。“你以为我是傻瓜?
2、rhetorical是什么意思。rhetorical 生词本 去背诵 英 [rɪˈtɒrɪkl] 美 [rɪˈtɔ:rɪkl]adj。修辞的,修辞学的; 辞藻华丽的,虚夸的; 夸张的(文风)网 络 修辞的;带修辞色彩的;修辞学的;夸张的 派生词:rhetorically 双语例句 同反义词 更多资料 He grimaced。
3、historically什么意思。adv。在历史上; 从历史角度; 以历史观点; 根据历史事实;[例句]For applications such as reservation systems, CIOs have historically been able to compute lost revenue per outage minute。对诸如恢复系统之类的应用程序,CIO们在历史上一直能够计算,每分钟停电所造成的经济损失。[其他]形近词: rheto。
4、英语单词翻译 “文邹邹的”。大词“也就是”big words“。
5、rhetorical battle的意思是什么?以及所有关于rhetorical的用法。may have been used as a rhetorical device to argue for a perpetuation of a United Nations role。 这些论据或许是用来作为一种修辞手段来论证联合国将发挥长久的作用。rhetoricallySuddenly, the narrator speaks in his most rhetorically elevated mode。 突然,解说员开始用高昂煽情的语调解说起来。
1、lucky副词,有懂得吗?other serious injuries。老天保佑,我一直很幸运,别的重伤都躲过了。9。 The two officers were extremely lucky to escape serious injury。那两名警官极其幸运,没有受重伤。10。 Do these kids know how lucky they are? Jackson asked rhetorically。“这些孩子知道他们有多幸运吗?”杰克逊反问道。
2、新视野大学英语第三册Unit8课后翻译答案(第3版)。 Rhetorical questions are mainly intended to stir up the readers’ emotions, to put them off guard, making them ready to accept the writer’s opinion。 Rhetorically, this is called emotional appeal。 By using rhetorical questions four times, the writer of this text is 。
3、介绍、推荐的英语是什么。he asks, rhetorically in the introduction。 ”什么是生命?"他在介绍部分煞有介事地问。 3、He might even explain why in the introduction or when he talks about the limitations of his study。 But you could still ask the question。 他可能已经说明了为什么什么东西在介绍里或者他会在什么时候说说他研究。
4、lucky的名词。名词:luck 形容词:lucky 副词:luckily 【luck】:名词(不可数) ,运气, 好运, 幸运 You never know your luck。 你也许会走运的。【Luckily】:副词,幸运地,幸亏,侥幸 Luckily there was a doctor on the spot。 幸运的是现场有一位医生。【fortunately】:副词,幸运地 Fortunately, you have the。
5、专八阅读英译中一句。the natural bias for ^^是对………偏私的意思 if they dont cannibalize their product lines, someone else will do it for them。 Even the greatest of brand names are not immune。 As the authors ask rhetorically, would IBM even exist today had it stuck to its core business in mainf。